Joint tenancy is a form of property co-ownership that features a right of survivorship, meaning that upon the death of one joint tenant, their share automatically transfers to the remaining joint tenant(s), bypassing the probate process. This can simplify the transfer of property and avoid costly and lengthy probate proceedings. However, it also allows for the potential strategic or even malicious use of this feature to circumvent a joint tenant's wishes regarding their will or heirs.
Severance of Joint Tenancy: Individual Rights and Practical Considerations
Joint tenancy requires the four unities of time, title, interest, and possession. This means that joint tenants acquire their interest simultaneously, from the same deed, in equal shares, and with equal rights to the whole property. The severance of joint tenancy can occur if any of these unities are disrupted, commonly through the conveyance of a joint tenant’s interest to another party, thus converting their share into a tenancy in common with the new owner.
Example: Anna and Ben own a house as joint tenants. Anna sells her half to Claire, severing the joint tenancy and creating a tenancy in common between Ben and Claire. Now, Ben’s share will pass to his estate upon his death, not automatically to Claire.
Despite the legal right of each joint tenant to sell or transfer their share independently, practical challenges such as a limited market for partial interests and lender hesitations often discourage such actions. This practical reality usually leads to joint decisions on property management and conveyance.
Example: Suppose Tom and Jerry own a house as joint tenants. If Tom decides to sell his half of the house to Alice, this action severs the joint tenancy. Tom can legally complete this transaction without Jerry’s consent, but this introduces unexpected complications for Jerry, who must now co-own and manage the property with Alice, a new and potentially unfamiliar partner. Additionally, if Alice seeks to secure a loan against her half, she may find it challenging to find a lender willing to accommodate. Lenders are generally reluctant to secure loans against a partial interest in a property because their security interest would be limited to her share, which cannot be easily sold in case of default. This is why joint tenants often opt for making unanimous decisions regarding the property to avoid such complications.
By understanding these individual rights and considering the practical implications, joint tenants can better navigate their co-ownership arrangements, balancing legal rights with practical realities to manage property effectively and harmoniously.
Trusts and the Absence of Right of Survivorship
Trusts differ fundamentally from joint tenancies as they do not inherently possess a right of survivorship. In a trust, a trustee manages the assets for the beneficiaries as per the trust document, and the trust itself holds legal title to the property.
When assets are placed into a trust, they are owned by the trust, not the beneficiaries. The distribution of these assets upon a beneficiary’s death is governed by the trust terms, not by survivorship.
Example: David places a vacation home into a trust, naming his children, Emma and Liam, as beneficiaries. The trust dictates that Emma’s interest does not pass to Liam upon her death but to her children, illustrating how asset distribution is controlled by the trust’s terms, set by the grantor.
Conclusion
Joint tenancy, with its inherent right of survivorship, provides a mechanism for property transfer that bypasses probate but may inadvertently circumvent a tenant's individual wishes. This form of ownership can simplify the transfer process at the cost of potentially overriding the intended estate plans of the co-owners. In contrast, trusts offer a structured method to honor and enforce the specific intentions of the property owner. Trusts are designed to ensure that the management and distribution of assets are carried out according to the granter's explicit directions, safeguarding against the unintentional evasion of their wishes.
Both legal mechanisms serve important but distinct roles in estate planning. Joint tenancy is advantageous for those seeking simplicity and ease of transfer upon death, though it may not always align perfectly with more complex or specific testamentary objectives. On the other hand, trusts provide a robust framework for those who aim to maintain control over how their assets are used and distributed after their death, reflecting a more precise fulfillment of their estate planning goals.
Strategic Insight: If you find yourself in a situation where a co-owner (joint tenant) may be acting contrary to your shared interests or intentions—a 'rogue' tenant—it may be practical to consider severing the joint tenancy. By ending the joint tenancy and transferring the ownership into a trust, you can establish expressly defined management and distribution terms that reflect your specific wishes and safeguard your estate against unpredictable actions from other joint tenants. This shift not only provides greater control but also enhances legal protections for your assets, ensuring they are handled precisely as you envision.
Navigating these legal landscapes effectively requires a nuanced understanding of how joint tenancies and trusts can best serve an individual's or a family's needs, often necessitating the guidance of an estate planning attorney to ensure that property and assets are managed and distributed according to the owner's wishes, preserving their intentions across generations.
Written by Alex J. Lindeke
Disclaimer: This content is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting based on any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.